Aplicant Tracking Systems and Competative Advantage for Recruiting Agencies in The World of Web 2.0
Copyright Gene Leshinsky, distribute freely with proper crediting
Organizational Background
Techruiter, Inc. (TECHINC) is a consulting firm specializing in providing IT solutions to a wide range of industries and clients. TECHINC has a Staffing Division that operates as a staffing agency performing individual Staff Augmentation projects.
TECHINC competes with other systems integrators as well as staffing agencies by providing solutions and staff augmentation services. Solutions are project based work when a TECHINC sales team approaches a client and bids to resolve a certain issue the client is having with its systems. If the bid is successful, TECHINC produces the plans as well as the talent to solve the problem. When TECHINC participates in staff augmentation projects it is often for one resource to augment a project team already onsite and not managed by TECHINC.
TECHINC is a very small company compared to its rivals such as Accenture, Ajilon, and Keane, amongst thousands of other companies in the industry. TECHINC has a very simple technological footprint that is anchored in Microsoft Office with Outlook and Yahoo messenger anchoring on a base of laptops, PC’s, and phones.
TECHINC has two important asset and competitive advantages: 1) its people and the ability to find and recruit these people, 2) its clients and the ability to sell effectively to these clients.
The sales organization at TECHINC will have the same benefits as the recruiting. Substituting sales for recruiting as it pertains to the Staffing and solutions business is equitable since each side succeeds by building strong relationships.
Technology Introduction
Applicant Tracking System (
The ATS provides reporting services to recruiters and managers that are displayed on a dashboard and allow the users to know exactly what is happening in real time including active candidates, open positions, upcoming opportunities, terminations, “hot sheets” recent contact lists, gross profit, and Revenue. Additional information may be configured on an as needed basis, such as birthdays, company events, and news items.
The
Use and Benefits
Adopting an
Furthermore, an effective
Competitive Uses and Benefits.
An
The competitive advantage of data mining passive candidates and those who have worked on TECHINC projects in the past cannot be valued since the effectiveness of a database depends on the skill of the recruiter using the database as will as the efficiency of the search mechanism within the database. However, the
The
Technology Analysis
The technology of an ATS/CRM is a natural extension of the human capabilities of individual recruiters and sales managers. An individual recruiter cannot memorize 3000 names and recall in an instant the candidate with a specific skill set that was submitted to particular opportunity 7.5 months ago. Nor can a sales manager remember the birthdays of all the client managers or when to congratulate them with a graduation and take the opportunity to build the relationship. The ATS/CRM does this and all the user has to do is remember a very general skill set or look at a dashboard and realize that it may be a good time to reach out to a prospect.
Without these technological advances that are readily available on the market and that will continue to evolve in the next 5 to 10 years, recruiting and sales cannot compete with everyone else who uses these systems to augment relationship building acumen. The risks of losing data associated with a large repository are insignificant to the risk of losing competitive advantage through not having an ATS. While there are alternatives to the ATS such as Outlook and Excel, these are so standard in the market that not having them would drive you out of business, while having them gives no advantage at all since they are ubiquitous.
ATS/CRM are evolving constantly and adding capabilities. Integrated search engines, contact managers, tools that automate recruiting to the nth degree are emerging in the market. However, these innovations cannot have a drastic effect on the current systems unless they completely take the human element out of recruiting and that is science fiction for the present time. The individual recruiter will always be the relationship builder even if he only has to think to put in motion the IT functions of his tools.
Addressing Operational and Competitive Risks
The cost of adoption depends on whether the software is ASP based or out of the box. Out of the box software can cost $500 - $1000 per license, while an ASP or SaaS package may cost $1000 to $2000 annually. Since there is no legacy system to integrate with at TECHINC nor is there a server that acts as the central database for collaborative software to be installed on the server, TECHINC will have to select the ASP. The initial cost is that of purchasing the license for the number of users who will have access to the system. TECHINC currently has 20 employees, with an estimate of $1000 per seat, which is $20,000 per year.
The ROI will come in 3 months as $20,000 is less then what 1 TECHINC contractor brings in gross profit in 3 months. This is just the payback since the true benefit of having a comprehensive business intelligence tool and database is essential for the company to stay competitive.
Furthermore, a careful analysis of a recruiters[iv] output in 1 year clearly illustrates the tremendous value of having a database. The recruiter contacted, spoke with, and submitted close to 900 candidates in 1 year. This means that if the recruiter were to call these 900 and ask for 3( conservative) referrals or references, that would put him in contact with an additional 1800 viable prospects/ candidates, assuming a very conservative 10% lead generation from the 1800 prospects, that’s 180 new potential clients, assuming a further 10% conversion rate of 18 new clients per year, with every client having at least 5 requirements that are filled by TECHINC recruiting at an average gross profit of $30,000, that’s $2.7 million in gross profit per year just from prospecting. Assume further, that TECHINC entered its client data from the last 100 engagements and had a sales manager call these companies systematically inquiring about opportunities, suppose 20 companies had active requisitions and knew TECHINC for a good company, and further assume that each company gave TECHINC 5 reqs that year; that would be another $3 million in gross profit. Thus in a single year, TECHINC could make nearly $6 million in gross profit simply by having an effective
The ATS will also enable managers to measure sales and recruiters metrics in a more organized methodical nature. The tracking functions will tell managers which recruiter contacted how many candidates and the results of those contacts. The manager will also have a dashboard that will enable him to see all the current activity without spending countless hours in meetings.
The most significant risk associated with having a central database with thousands of candidates is that an employee may decide to steal it and start their own company. The best way to defend against this is to restrict export and download capabilities within the ATS and this threat is eliminated. Not even the administrator of the ATS systems should have total access to the database export and download controls. Only the owner of the company should hold the key to the database. If the data leak occurs then the company can rely on non disclosure and non confidentiality agreements to sustain proprietary information, however to rely solely on an NDA will probably mean that the company will eventually lose its database. Regardless of this risk, the company will not lose its competitive advantage while allowing a consideration such as this to stop an ATS/CRM implementation is unwise.
The company can do nothing and follow its present course leaning heavily on the sales side to bring business and scrambling to find qualified candidates on the public job boards and outsourcing recruiting to other companies. The cost of doing nothing is equal to the lost opportunity ROI. Not adopting the new technology is like closing your eyes to the obvious and suffering the consequences of your competition having the technology as a standard operating procedure while you wonder why your organization is being out recruited.
At this time, the adoption is urgent because it is 30 years overdue. Due to the small size of the company, TECHINC does not need an extensive network infrastructure or other IT applications. However, if TECHINC grows as they intend to do these upgrades will be come necessary and the
The organization is a laggard. Most recruiting organization have an ATS or some database of candidates they have recruited in the past.[vi] However, since there are only 2 recruiters, both of whom have such different styles of recruiting as not to interfere with each other, the ATS is only necessary because one of the recruiters can start building the database for the company. Since there is no database, the recruiter will not have the tools to build it. The company can wait until it grows to several recruiters who will begin to step on each other by calling candidates who have already been called but there is no way to track that in the non existent ATS. When this becomes a problem then implementation will be absolutely necessary to avoid the recruiting team from imploding in a political battle.[vii]
Adoption Consideration Process
The process for implementing an
The business process would not change much as the same processes will have to be followed by sales and recruiting but they will need to be documented using the new system. The adoption of the ATS will also mean immediate payback for managers who will have activity and performance metrics in front of them the same day the system goes into effect.
The benefits of implementing the ATS/CRM far outweigh any risk, and the ROI is excellent, both in monetary terms and those of business process.
References:
[Dmoz]
http://dmoz.org/Computers/Software/Human_Resources/Recruitment_Management/
[Hr-Guide]
http://www.hr-guide.com/data/206.htm
[i] A recruiter was working on one opportunity and did not realize the candidate was good for a different opportunity. If the candidate had placed at the missed opportunity the resulting revenue would have been $21,000.
[ii] Federal guidelines require the accurate collection and storage of information pertaining to applicant and applicant diversity. Companies’ larger then 15 employees are mandated by EEOC to perform this tracking. See http://www.eeoc.gov/
[iii] I have developed ways of measuring my own metrics without an
[iv] I submitted 250 candidates, generated 100 leads in 9 months, and the total conversion gave the company probably around 20-25 reqs. Of which we filled around 50%.
[v] In reality, one of these companies could give TECHINC 50 reqs per year. I tried to be conservative, but strong relationships in this business can mean millions to the bottom line.
[vi] Smaller shops and individual recruiters can make due with Excel spread sheets and Outlook, however once a company gets beyond the 2-3 recruiters, it is extremely poor planning not to have an
[vii] I have seen this happen, “candidate ownership” is a thorny issue in agencies. Recruiters guard their candidates with extreme jealousy and management usually takes great pains to make sure the ownership is respected though out the organization. If not the “recruiting pit” becomes a nightmarish place to work and the “recruiting engine” loses efficiency.
[1] A recruiter was working on one opportunity and did not realize the candidate was good for a different opportunity. If the candidate had placed at the missed opportunity the resulting revenue would have been $21,000.
[1] Federal guidelines require the accurate collection and storage of information pertaining to applicant and applicant diversity. Companies’ larger then 15 employees are mandated by EEOC to perform this tracking. See http://www.eeoc.gov/
Tags: ATS, candidate, recruiting, resume, staffing